Multiculturalism has become so normalized today in many parts of the Western world that people will likely give you dirty looks if you were to even question it. To these people, criticizing the merits of multiculturalism and diversity is like attacking the very foundation of the society. In fact, it’s very possible that they will label you as a racist and ostracize you for it. Some will even go out of their way to defend the ideals of multiculturalism with religious zeal because they have been conditioned and socialized to do so by the government.
Let’s be clear about one thing: No one asked the people if they wanted their country to be dumped with immigrants from foreign cultures. No one asked the people if they wanted to turn their proud country into a multi-ethnic cesspool. No, the people were not asked. The government made the decision on their own and simply imposed the torrential social change upon the people. To the government, its own citizens are merely lab rats for their social engineering experiment.
To ensure the successful implementation of their multicultural agenda, the government had to control people’s minds through the educational system and the mass media. No one was spared the opportunity to think for themselves on the matter, they were simply told what to think and feel. If you think this is just some conspiracy theory, just take look at how many immigrants are coming into your country every year and every month and the demographic changes that are happening as a result. And look at how much money (your tax money) and effort the government is putting into integrating the immigrants to the society and promoting diversity. The government also doesn’t shy away from using other subversive of methods as well: from going out of their way to defy reason by recategorizing race, to eliminating the concept of race altogether, as well as doctoring photos with embarrassing Photoshop skills:
Whether you think it’s a conspiracy or not, and however you decide to think of the issue, two facts remain: A) Governments are allowing immigrants to flood into their respective countries and are actively pushing for multiculturalism and diversity, and B) The people were never allowed to voice their matter on the issue to begin with and are currently being suppressed for it.
Not long ago, men would have sacrificed their lives fighting for what they considered their land and their culture against any foreign invasion. This has been the way of mankind ever since the inception of the tribal order leading all the way up to our modern nationhoods. But today, a new kind of invasion is taking place on a daily basis without much outcry. With the open door immigration policy, foreigners from all over the world have been able to flood into countries—with the Anglosphere and the Western Europe being most popular destinations—and dilute the population pool. Even when they manage to make up ten, twenty, or even thirty percent of the nation’s population, there is barely any outcry or resistance from the general public. People would never tolerate having thirty percent of their nation’s land being taken away, so why are they allowing foreigners to take that much of their living space? What is the government’s purpose for diluting a nation’s race, culture, and identity by promoting multiculturalism and diversity?
From the point of view of the citizens, there is no clear advantage of having a multicultural society. The only benefit that gets repeated over and over again is the idea of cultural enrichment; which is more of a preference rather than a real advantage. Besides, great cultural achievements of the past didn’t arise from multi-ethnic or multicultural societies; they all came about as a result of securing their own unique identity. Think of ancient Egypt or the Chinese civilization, both of which managed to maintain their great cultures for thousands of years by guarding their identities. In Europe, the likes of Dante, Shakespeare, and Beethoven didn’t needed to be ‘enriched’ by multiculturalism to create their timeless works of art.
And if flooding the country with immigrants for the sake of diversity is so great, wouldn’t most people be in favour of increasing or at least maintaining the immigration level? No, quite the contrary. Most people only tolerate immigration out of fear of being accused of racism. It’s quite telling that in Canada, a country that prides itself with its cultural diversity, most people are in favour of limiting the number of immigrants, including 58% of those born outside of Canada. The same aversion to immigrants is shown in other countries experimenting with multiculturalism such as Australia, the UK, and the rest of Europe.
So, if majority of the population are opposed to the idea of having more immigrants in their countries and having their national cultural, and ethnic identities disintegrated, what is the real reason behind its continuation? Since it’s a social experiment being engineered by the government, you must look at it in their perspective to understand the reason behind it. While the primary reason for allowing mass immigration in the first place is for purely economical reasons, I will argue here that there is another, more subversive, reason: control.
Although there is no real advantage for the general population in continuing the open-door immigration policy, there is one significant benefit for those at the top: promoting diversity through immigration and multiculturalism allows the people to become easier to control. It’s a classic method of divide and rule
A concentration of men—unified through race, culture, and belief—represents a political force to be reckoned with. One of the most vocal and restless political groups today are ethnic and nationalist movements that are fighting for their groups’ rights or independence. These are the groups that will not tolerate their government’s attempts at controlling them. These are the people who will oppose and fight against anyone who threatens their group’s identity. These are men who have a clear conception of who they are and what they represent. And they represent the kind of political identity that can threaten those in power. This is why governments allow their nations to be flooded with foreigners in order to disintegrate the concentration of a unified race of people and to break down their strength and political cohesion. (This is also why feminist and gynocentric policies are continually being pushed to control men.) Even if it might take time and effort initially to integrate the immigrant population and convince the native population to accept them, higher level of control can be achieved in the long-run by diversifying the population this way. They don’t openly suggest this and they may not even be aware that this is what they’re doing, but the consequences make it clear. As a very real example of using demographic intermixing to erase a group’s identity for political purposes, refer to the Chinese government’s promotion of interracial marriage in Tibet to erase the Tibetan ethnic identity.
The more ‘diversity’ there is, the more divided the people will be. This is why the practice of diversity extends beyond race to include different religions, political opinions, homosexuality (and whatever other sexuality they conjure up these days), and so on. The more divisions there are among the people, the better. As long as people are distracted and fighting each other over mundane issues like abortion, race issues, cultural issues, women’s rights, homosexual rights, etc., the less concentrated they will be to fight the government over real issues of power and control. In the point of view of the government, the perfect citizens are divided and complacent slaves who continue to pay their taxes and engage in consumerism without challenging their authority.
All this is happening because the governments of today no longer represent the interests of the people. They no longer identify themselves with the race and culture in which the nation was founded upon. The practice now is to put profit above all else while having complete control over the people as a farmer would with his chickens. This process will continue on until nation states become completely devoid of its racial and cultural identities to become nothing but a pool of mongrelized population to be exploited.